Sorry this is NOT BARRY HANSON, but it was on Barry's account. I don't know the speaker, do you????? Wasn't Rosa Koire, Behind the Green Mask, talking about this ...
Sorry this is NOT BARRY HANSON, but it was on Barry's account. I don't know the speaker, do you????? Wasn't Rosa Koire, Behind the Green Mask, talking about this ...
Sorry, i accidently prematurely posted my comment. Thus this comment is in two parts.
I believe the common denominator may be the utilization of patented processes such as Hendricus G. Loos Patent No. US 6,506,148 B2 Patent date Jan. 14, 2003, and others to mass manipulate the public mindset through their EMF devises. Permeating an acceptance of corporate presentments as authorities. By the way the legal definition for the word authority is permission.
As a man of mankind, I will to align with what is true and real and exist in fact.
One controls what one creates. Our Creator created man and woman thus is over man and woman. Corporations can not create man through their copyrighted corporate charters, so they create titles (mask) that man can accept willingly or unwittingly, either way a corporation will take you on board.
Another oversight that l believe incumbers man is that we just don't know the workings of corporate systems of control and manipulation. We don't in our general knowledge base know the legal writing doctrines. Do we? I.e. we are not in general likely to know the doctrine of inclusio units est exclusio alterius which means The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person (i.e. title/mask) is an absolute exclusion of all others. This doctrine decrees that where law expressly describes particular situation to which it shall apply, an irrefutable inference must be drawn that what is omitted or excluded was intended to be omitted or excluded. 11 Coke 58b.
With Ref. Baron David Ward of the House of Ward announcement and decree March 20th 2015.
Another oversight I believe encumbers man is that it is not top of mind that "a corporation is a legal embodiment by an act of registration... To be legal then there has to be a meeting of the minds and an agreement between two parties. Legal is by agreement."
"A legal embodiment by act of registration where there is nothing of material substance created, is nothing more than a figment of the mind that has agreed to create nothing of material substance."
"All that is created by the same process is equal in status and standing to anything else that is created by the same process. There is a peer relationship of equals that are separate legal embodiments. "
"Legal embodiments by act of registration are created as equals by default and have a peer relationship by default. "
A corporation has no obligation to anything other than the corporation and to the exclusion of anything or anybody else
One other oversight I believe persist is that it is not top of mind that the entire world (legal fiction) operates under the UCC (Uniform Commercial code. We operate under commercial law, the laws of commerce regulate the act of doing business or contracting with others. All communications are offers to contract with the recipients of the offers.
So the question we may want to ask ourselves is has a communication (offer) transpired through which an obligation upon me the man or woman has been created? Am I the holder of any titles (mask) which may joinder me by means to a copyrighted private charter. Put another way how have I given my permission to another or an entity?
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all man of mankind Unalienable Rights Reserved This sharing of my understanding is not legal advise or advise of any form. Shared for knowledge sake only. Any act is the sole responsibility of the actor.
Almost forgot there are only 5 ways to respond to communications (offers) under the UCC. 3 are honorable and 2 are dishonorable.
Is it not true that the pen is mightier than the sword?
Thank you Joel Sussmann for verbally capturing and presenting the discourse of our human condition in a way that anyone listening can discern their own experience and the associated causative sources of the choking out of man and woman of mankind.
There must be a common denominator as to why we (so many of mankind) all seem to collectively exhibit an identifiable common oversight. The oversight I am referring to is a trend towards presumption by mankind of presumed authority granted (given away through our acts and speech) to private corporations to which we are not party.
Meaning, is it not the Pen that is at play encombering the will of man and woman of mankind?
Sorry, i accidently prematurely posted my comment. Thus this comment is in two parts.
I believe the common denominator may be the utilization of patented processes such as Hendricus G. Loos Patent No. US 6,506,148 B2 Patent date Jan. 14, 2003, and others to mass manipulate the public mindset through their EMF devises. Permeating an acceptance of corporate presentments as authorities. By the way the legal definition for the word authority is permission.
As a man of mankind, I will to align with what is true and real and exist in fact.
One controls what one creates. Our Creator created man and woman thus is over man and woman. Corporations can not create man through their copyrighted corporate charters, so they create titles (mask) that man can accept willingly or unwittingly, either way a corporation will take you on board.
Another oversight that l believe incumbers man is that we just don't know the workings of corporate systems of control and manipulation. We don't in our general knowledge base know the legal writing doctrines. Do we? I.e. we are not in general likely to know the doctrine of inclusio units est exclusio alterius which means The inclusion of one is the exclusion of another. The certain designation of one person (i.e. title/mask) is an absolute exclusion of all others. This doctrine decrees that where law expressly describes particular situation to which it shall apply, an irrefutable inference must be drawn that what is omitted or excluded was intended to be omitted or excluded. 11 Coke 58b.
With Ref. Baron David Ward of the House of Ward announcement and decree March 20th 2015.
Another oversight I believe encumbers man is that it is not top of mind that "a corporation is a legal embodiment by an act of registration... To be legal then there has to be a meeting of the minds and an agreement between two parties. Legal is by agreement."
"A legal embodiment by act of registration where there is nothing of material substance created, is nothing more than a figment of the mind that has agreed to create nothing of material substance."
"All that is created by the same process is equal in status and standing to anything else that is created by the same process. There is a peer relationship of equals that are separate legal embodiments. "
"Legal embodiments by act of registration are created as equals by default and have a peer relationship by default. "
A corporation has no obligation to anything other than the corporation and to the exclusion of anything or anybody else
One other oversight I believe persist is that it is not top of mind that the entire world (legal fiction) operates under the UCC (Uniform Commercial code. We operate under commercial law, the laws of commerce regulate the act of doing business or contracting with others. All communications are offers to contract with the recipients of the offers.
So the question we may want to ask ourselves is has a communication (offer) transpired through which an obligation upon me the man or woman has been created? Am I the holder of any titles (mask) which may joinder me by means to a copyrighted private charter. Put another way how have I given my permission to another or an entity?
WITHOUT PREJUDICE, i.e. all man of mankind Unalienable Rights Reserved This sharing of my understanding is not legal advise or advise of any form. Shared for knowledge sake only. Any act is the sole responsibility of the actor.
Almost forgot there are only 5 ways to respond to communications (offers) under the UCC. 3 are honorable and 2 are dishonorable.
Is it not true that the pen is mightier than the sword?
The man in the video is Joel Sussmann from Canada.
Thank you Joel Sussmann for verbally capturing and presenting the discourse of our human condition in a way that anyone listening can discern their own experience and the associated causative sources of the choking out of man and woman of mankind.
There must be a common denominator as to why we (so many of mankind) all seem to collectively exhibit an identifiable common oversight. The oversight I am referring to is a trend towards presumption by mankind of presumed authority granted (given away through our acts and speech) to private corporations to which we are not party.
Great speech! Great delivery.
Where was this videoed, Canadian Parliament?