21 Comments
User's avatar
Russell G. Wells's avatar

Don't you find it just A LITTLE COINCIDENTAL that someone just happened to be photographing the bridge at that exact moment? What are the chances that a random person, at that time of day, decided to take a shot of a thoroughly unremarkable bridge at exactly the beginning of this disaster?

Expand full comment
Lynn's avatar

Who was the person? Why wasn't there a harbor pilot on the ship?

Expand full comment
Frontera Lupita's avatar

Yes…why do we have these ‘moments’ captured as they are happening? Now everyone and everything is suspect!

Expand full comment
Marty Ellenbecker's avatar

UPDATE - Saturday, 30 March 1:30 PM -just saw a CBS video stating that a videographer

had set up for this shot "for a maritime interest group" [unnamed].

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excellent point, but could've been some tourist's kid thinking the ship was cool.

A bridge fan would probably have framed this shot differently.

Of more concern and relevance is how soon did this video show up?

If other views were available, they'd probably be on YouTube by now.

I'm going to go back and look for that controlled demolition idea video.

I zipped past that one, but if I remember right it was daytime.

Expand full comment
Marin Grin's avatar

It's hard to know Marty. They seem to tell us what they are doing in popular culture, so the edges between reality (whatever that really is) and engineered or staged are blurry. Let us know if you found that video, or any other info. We can keep speculating about so many things and then follow our hearts to do our next indicated step in this strange world!

Expand full comment
Marin Grin's avatar

I don't trust anything like this, from any side of the story. . . false flag? coincidence? hmmm.

Expand full comment
Lynn's avatar

This is even bigger than 9-11 financially.

Expand full comment
KatB's avatar

Redacted News on Rumble did an interesting piece on this today. Extended video shows electrical went out three times before hitting the bridge. https://rumble.com/v4lqqri-the-truth-is-coming-out-in-the-baltimore-bridge-collapse-general-mike-flynn.html. General Mike Flynn calls it a "black swan" event.

Expand full comment
Marty Ellenbecker's avatar

NO. Extended video shows LIGHTS went out three times before hitting the bridge.

It would make sense to have their load separated from power and other circuitry,

and for light system testing and upgrades

Were there any video segments showing change in smoke plume or possibly the bow thruster?

Were there any alarms to be heard?

Expand full comment
Jan Hunter's avatar

Very, very interesting but cautiously holding my opinions back until more and more info comes out. The explosions shown in some corners of the internet are of note but not jumping into a controlled demolition conclusion just yet as that big ship would have done enough damage as-is. P.S. what is the best way to send you folks at Marin Grin direct messages if and when something important arises?

Expand full comment
Marin Grin's avatar

marinfreedom@protonmail.com. Way to go to get as much info before forming opinions Jan. Wise Woman!

Expand full comment
Jan Hunter's avatar

Thank you. (I'm a guy but thank you anyway.)

Expand full comment
Marin Grin's avatar

So sorry. . . I think I knew that.

Expand full comment
Marin Grin's avatar

I remember because you're a friend of a friend but I don't remember which friend? Steve Devas?

Expand full comment
markbachelder's avatar

Just to throw out another perspective - looking at this from "cui bono" who benefits? Framed as a black swan event, pretending to be an accident, but curious speculation - like this article - reveals that as a strategic move it was just too valuable to be just an accident. Who is the devil lurking behind the curtain - the CCP of course! Only they could do this...Who would benefit the most from setting up a war with China? The weapons makers that got us into Iraq, Afghanistan, Ukraine, and more? Who benefits the most from creating chaos and even more division in US populace? Who benefits the most from a great distraction...from what other events? Who the heck is so damn good at planning these things? I think we want to consider all these angles, before we run off with our pitchforks and torches to make war with China.

Expand full comment
Marin Grin's avatar

Wise man Mark. Thank you, Yes. I agree.

Expand full comment
S.M. Carson's avatar

As Freud once said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar...

Expand full comment
Marin Grin's avatar

Good one, and what a coincidence this might be! I'm open to cigar? No cigar? And that is the question SR.

Expand full comment
Elsa's avatar

Excellent analysis

Expand full comment
Sabrina Page's avatar

whoa

Expand full comment