Spotlight on California Assembly Bill 659
It is likely that your Assembly person is uninformed and this - wait, get what they named it - “Cancer Prevention Act” (why don’t they stop the pesticides, hormone disruptors, crap in food, exhaust, radiation, etc. if they give a shit about cancer) was drafted only based on marketing material presented to them by Merck. By educating them you might get them to do the right thing.
It is also possible your representative has significant conflicts of interest and will respond negatively to your concerns. In these cases, it is time make sure they do not get re-elected and find replacements who represent your interests.
California AB 659, also known as the “Cancer Prevention Act,” (Author-Aguiar-Curry, Coauthors: Assembly Members Wendy Carrillo, Friedman, Kalra, Ortega, Papan, and Blanca Rubio and Senator Wiener) seeks to add the Gardasil vaccine to the vaccines required to attend school in California for grades 8 to 12. This bill should be of concern to all parents and physicians committed to practicing ethical medicine. Gardasil has a poor track record in delivering on its promised outcomes. There is mounting evidence that Gardasil is a high-risk solution with no evidence it improves morbidity and mortality related to cervical cancer, which is its only selling point.
In Australia, government data reveals a sharp increase in cervical cancer rates in young women following the implementation of Gardasil vaccinations. Thirteen years after Gardasil was released and pushed upon teenagers and young adults, there has been a 16 percent increase in 25–29 year-olds and a 30 percent increase in 30–34 year-olds contracting cervical cancer, corroborating the clinical trial data that Gardasil may increase the risk of cervical cancer, particularly in people who had previous HPV infections. Meanwhile, rates are decreasing for older women (who have not been vaccinated).
The medical literature documents serious autoimmune, autonomic, and neurological dysfunction associated with Gardasil. One of the serious adverse events now emerging in vaccinated girls, including teens, is premature ovarian failure, which often results in an inability to bear children.[1]
Numerous medical professionals have sharply criticized Merck’s conduct of its clinical trials of Gardasil. An article published in the British Medical Journal outlines some of the flaws in Merck’s Gardasil clinical trials.[2]
The bill was introduced on February 9, 2023 and may be heard in committee as early as March 14, 2023
[1]D. T. Little and H. R. Ward, “Adolescent Premature Ovarian Insufficiency Following Human Papillomavirus Vaccination: A Case Series Seen in General Practice,” Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact, Case Reports 1-12, Oct.-Dec. 2014
D. T. Little and H. R. Ward, “Premature ovarian failure 3 years after menarche in a 16-year-old girl following human papillomavirus vaccination,” BMJ Case Reports September 30, 2012.
[2] Peter Doshi et al., “Call to Action: RIAT Restoration of Previously Unpublished Methodology in Gardasil Vaccine Trials,” 346 Brit. Med. J. 2865, 2019.
Call To Action
Parents and patients: Please contact your legislators to educate them on the facts about Gardasil. Make it clear the bill will be detrimental to both a child's health and education; you expect them to oppose this bill. It is likely that your Assembly person is uninformed and this Cancer Prevention Act was drafted only based on marketing material presented to them by Merck. By educating them you might get them to do the right thing.
It is also possible your representative has significant conflicts of interest and will respond negatively to your concerns. In these cases, it is time make sure they do not get re-elected and find replacements who represent your interests.
Physicians committed to the ethical practice of medicine: Please educate your patients, colleagues and lawmakers on the risk and benefits of mandating Gardasil and why this bill is poor policy.
Educate and inform: watch and share this young man’s story about life after Gardasil.
Advocate. Yes, You!
Collectivism, Medical Communism, and Medical Autonomy in Healthcare
At the moment, we are being given a choice:
To be subjected to a collective form of medical practice that is best described as medical communism.
To demand patient autonomy with individual sovereignty be respected, and to reject the one-size-fits-all medical paradigm being created by the government.
As Americans, we are averse to the idea of communism. We pride our country’s commitment to civil rights and liberties, and reject the idea any government has the authority to dictate personal life decisions. However, what we are currently witnessing in medical practice falls firmly under the umbrella of tyranny and communism.
We are told:
For the collective good, we must sacrifice our individual rights and beliefs.
For the collective good, we must not question the dictates of the ruling class.
For the collective good, we must be silent when we witness discrepancies in what we are being told and what we are experiencing.
And if we refuse, we will be punished, for the collective good.
As Americans, we reject the ideology that a handful of self-appointed authorities can dictate the collective good. Rather, our country is founded on the principle that individual responsibility, based on individual choice, is what leads to a highly functional society in which everyone benefits. Informed decision-making, based on complete uncensored information, allows such a democratic system to thrive and flourish. Nowhere is this more important than medical care.
Many states are currently in the process of making it impossible to get vaccine exemptions. Childhood vaccine mandates have surreptitiously been codified into law in many places. Exemptions were initially allowed so parents who did not want children to be vaccinated would not object to mandates. In addition, most parents trusted their doctors and were vaccinating them for their perceived medical value, not as a reason to participate in daily life activities, such as schooling. The fact that one needs to apply for an exemption from a medical intervention is unethical and a form of medical tyranny/communism.
We ask you to choose informed decision-making over medical communism rooted in mandates and censorship.
Action Steps:
Engage in the civic process.
Prioritize medical rights and patient autonomy by supporting candidates who are committed to protecting patient physician autonomy.
Be vocal. Educate and inform community members and work together to engage current lawmakers to ensure the laws they are passing represent the benefits and interest of the people they serve.
All this information MINUS THE CURSE WORDS are from Physicians and Patients Reclaiming Medicine. The curse words are mine, dammit!
We Need Your Help, Please Consider Donating To PPRM
The failure of government and authorities to serve their constituents demands citizens take action to protect and reclaim their rights. As basic as this might seem these battles actually require substantial legal resources and funding. A victory in a court of law becomes precedent setting and brings us closer to ending medical discrimination and tyranny. Please consider making a donation to fund PPRM and its critical mission. You can donate at reclaimingmed.org or mail checks to PO Box 7601, Berkeley, CA 94707
Physicians & Patients Reclaiming Medicine
A private membership organization bringing together patients, physicians and attorneys working collaboratively to defend and uphold medical rights and freedoms. PPRM's core mission is to reclaim medicine and restore patient-physician autonomy. As a community of patients and professionals, PPRM will defend and stand by healthcare providers advocating individualized, empathetic, and compassionate care.
Perfect! I loved the end of your article, all the writing is from Physicians and Patients reclaiming medicine, "the curse words are mine, dammit!!"