Exit the Who, One Stop Action Link
Common Law, Commoner Law, Sovereign Way, etc. Examples of Success to Share
TODAY! Coleman Freeway Overpass 4 PM - 7 PM
Dee’s Stack - Read the comments by Amy Harlib too
Foster Gamble on the War in Ukraine & more from Free to Thrive
BUILDING BRIDGES Marin Housing Solution? Please register, attend, and let us know
We have had several newsletter issues dedicated to EXITING the WHO, and now we need everyone to step up, take action and get the US out of this very dangerous situation. Below is a simple ONE-CLICK action to help us EXIT the WHO. Thank you to the CA Who Action Team, a grassroots group in Santa Cruz County.
***One Stop Action Button:
A Message from the CA WHO Action Team
This https://alignact.com/go/exit-the-who campaign from James Roguski empowers people to stand up for their freedoms by contacting each person’s own, plus ALL Congressmembers, who are encouraging support of HR79 & the creation of a similar Senate bill to make Exiting the WHO a reality. Our goal is to send this to many other freedom groups in hopes of multiplying our efforts on this time-sensitive actionable event. ExitTheWHO.com
This message is URGENT to protect our freedoms by Exiting the WHO!
As Americans who love our country and our freedoms, we are gravely concerned, and we believe you are also, about the overreaching global powers soon to be vested by default in the World Health Organization (WHO).
The WHO seeks to greatly expand its powers over global health via Amendments to the IHR (International Health Regulations) and the International Pandemic Treaty. As you know, these 100’s of amendments will automatically become legally binding on all 194 U.N. member nations unless those nations object.
IF THESE AMENDMENTS ARE ALLOWED TO BECOME INTERNATIONAL LAW, any WHO declaration of a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) --- which could even be a health “emergency” due to climate change! --- means they can dictate our personal health decisions.
Our rights, our freedoms, our privacy, personal choice, and informed consent --- are threatened!
Deadlines for stopping this are fast approaching --- IHR Amendments already “adopted” must be rejected by Nov. 20 & Dec. 1, 2023. Early 2024 deadlines loom for other Amendments.
Please “blast” this Align Act campaign https://alignact.com/go/exit-the-who ASAP to your lists. It seeks to inform & empower people to support HR79, which would get our country OUT of the WHO.
One click sends a message to the signer’s Congress members; one more click sends the message to every member of Congress.
Remember, Silence = Consent!
*** With So Many Sovereign Law Groups Popping Up…how do we know which information is correct?
We have several freedom friends who, for the last 3+ years, have been studying common law, sovereign law, PMAs, and similar paths that include correcting your status. We are curious to hear how things are going with respect to any ‘legal’ situations and are we a Government of the People, or a Government of Fiction. If you’d had any experience where you’ve been entangled in any ‘legal’ situation but are operating outside the system, please share your experiences. So far we only know about 4 people who are on the land, who had had to resort to maritime lawyers to help them because Marin jurisdiction does not recognize anything else. Of course Marin is also deeply steeped into the whole pandemic psyops, and one of the freedom friendly attorneys advocating in a zoom (because , you know - too dangerous to have court in person) meeting to help a parent protect his child from the jab HAD HIS MIC MUTED by the Marin Judge when he mentioned some of the freedom-friendly physicians. A few years ago there was a schism in the followers of Anna Von Reitz: State National v. Sovereign Citizen, and other terms are used to define people who have taken the sovereign way. A bit of a controversial article follows about Constitutional Law. What do you think? Please put comments in the Substack Comment area and do not email to marin freedom. Thank you.
*** Today, August 31, Coleman Freeway Overpass 4 PM - 7 PM
*** Dee’s Stack - Read the long comment by Amy Harlib too
*** Foster Gamble: Top 10 “Need to Know” Insights about the Ukraine War, and more from Free to Thrive
https://www.freetothrive.com/email/7a8fa6cd-33b0-4d1b-b57e-e09f1a789b6b/
*** BUILDING BRIDGES MARIN HOUSING SOLUTIONS EVENT
One should definitely register and go. Pick up literature in whatever language it's printed. Take videos, especially of public officials groveling to this crowd. Supervisor Dennis Rodoni is known for this.
Ask questions, such as
You claim this housing must be built for our teachers, firefighters and local elders. How does one know that just arrived refugees or "migrants" won't get preference for whatever is built?
Think that's hogwash? Familiarize yourself with these websites:
https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/FPM/documents/PIH_New_Americans_Website.pdf
"Can Public Housing Authorities establish a preference for refugees?"
"Yes, PHAs may establish a preference for refugees as long as they do not create preferences based on national origin because national origin is a protected class under the Fair Housing Act and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964."
Then there's this:
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/r/r46462
"In the case of most federal rental assistance programs, including public housing, Housing Choice Vouchers, Section 8 project-based rental assistance, rural rental assistance, (including HUD homeless
assistance),... federal regulations do not require the verification of recipients’ immigration status.""The Trump Administration took a number of administrative actions to change the treatment of housing assistance in public
charge determinations and the treatment of mixed-status families in housing programs; these actions have been reversed by the Biden Administration."
🤔
https://canalalliance.org/event/building-bridges-marin-housing-solutions-event/
Registration for this event will open at 11:00am PST on August 31, 2023. Please mark your calendars, space is limited.
BUILDING BRIDGES MARIN HOUSING SOLUTIONS EVENT
SEPTEMBER 14 @ 3:00PM - 5:00 PM
Canal Alliance Canal Alliance, Community Action Marin, North Marin Community Services, Legal Aid of Marin and Dominican University of California invite you to The Building Bridges for Housing Solutions Event
To be held at Dominican University of California
Offering an opportunity to discuss achievable solutions for Marin County, and to build a robust coalition. In a conversation moderated by Jenny Silva of the Marin Environmental Housing Coalition, experts in the fields of housing protection, preservation, and production will share their knowledge about practical solutions that can be implemented in Marin County. Closing remarks by the Marin Community Foundation
Panelists:
Alex Schafran, author, housing, planning & urban development
Somaya Abdelgany, Preservation Program Coordinator, Bay Area Housing Authority
Leah Simon-Weisberg, Legal director, Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment (ACCE) Institute
Kim Pipkin, Executive Director, Black Developers Forum
Ricardo Huerta Niño, Senior Initiative Officer, Great Communities Collaborative., San Francisco Foundation
Long read (but worth it):
https://economicresistance.substack.com/p/the-common-law-cult-part-one
It talks about the same ideology but it's from the UK, which makes American documents and history irrelevant and just a distraction.
I'm not aware of any school that explicitly sticks to the real natural law (but God given rights are already enshrined in the Bill of Rights, for example, someone requesting a jury trial already applies principles of natural law). But I've witnessed quite a few bad cases (definitely more than 4) of application of the contrived "common law" ideology - scams for money, putting yourself in jeopardy, spending tremendous time and resources for trivial things, hubris and victimhood culture, best case is being lucky with mixed methodology. I don't know of a single case when this ideology helped anyone (other than to reduce anxiety, same as useless masks ). Worst thing, the adversary can file outright frivolous charges against you when they're well aware that you're going to screw up your own defense, with a help of enablers and scammers (and nothing prevents those "advisors" from working for the prosecution behind your back). If something clearly doesn't work, hubris and victimhood culture tell you to double down on it... I gave up trying talking common sense to people, they're like scared zombies walking off a cliff. Basic logic, think of all those historical examples of totalitarianism, were the victims just stupid people who failed to "correct their status"? And laws are a double edged sword, if you claim they don't apply to you, they can't protect you either. If you claim that you don't have a contract with a judge, then you can't force this judge into your own contract to play by your rules. It's just very basic logic for children why it can't possibly work, nothing complicated. Not to be conflated with business structures (PMA) and knowing civics without help from attorneys. Nobody needs to be ignorant or confused.
WHO Are You? Who Who Hoo Hoo! THE WHO!
WHO ARE YOU GREAT SATAN?